If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
While it sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
However, what is a safe distance from a cell tower showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. http://note.pearltrees.com/14124007/b19fc9deab670a819137f9ff7a9ffe84 do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.